Do we flame you because you're implying the movie will be good, because you're implying it will be bad, or because you're just recognizing its existence?

Take your pick.

I'm questioning the need for its existence, since I disliked the first one.  The title comes from the fact that the person who pointed it out to me loved the first one, and it's not unusual for me to be in the minority for these things.

Posted by g026r at 6 Frimaire CCXII 13:21 (2003/11/26)

Alternatively, you could flame me for the horrible grammar that was present in the title until I fixed it last night.

I was only for about half an hour though, so most probably didn't see it.

Posted by g026r at 6 Frimaire CCXII 13:23 (2003/11/26)

Could we not also flame you for any other reason not related to the post?  Out of curiosity?

Sure! It's flame Andrew day (today only), so everyone get'cher flames in while you can!*

*Offer not valid in Quebec

Posted by g026r at 6 Frimaire CCXII 15:29 (2003/11/26)